David Pichler vs George Von Massow Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L L L W L L
Form
W W L L W W W W W LHead-To-Head: Pichler 1 - 0 Massow
They have played 3 sets in total, with Pichler winning 2 and Massow winning 1. The last match between Pichler and Massow was at the Turkey F50, 14-12-2015, Second, Hard with David Pichler getting the victory 7-6(5) 2-6 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| David Pichler | 1 |
| George Von Massow | 0 |
Turkey F50(14-12-2015)
7
6
2
6
6
3
| Pichler | Stats | Massow |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 853 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 390 | Highest Rank | 568 |
| 29 | Age | 35 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 3 | Titles | 3 |
| 56% (350-278) | Career Total W/L | 52% (189-173) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Rybakina VS Svitolina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Andreeva VS Frech PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 2-6 6-3 |
Stats 
David Pichler
Player
George Von Massow
58%
(
57 of
99)
1st Serve %
63%
(
66 of
104)
5
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
8
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
47 of
66)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
39 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
104)
104
Total Points Won
99
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 15 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 11 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 2:27:0 | Average Match Time | 2:27:0 |
| 58% (57/99) | 1st Serve % | 63% (66/104) |
| 68% (39/57) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (47/66) |
| 50% (21/42) | 2nd Serve Win % | 34% (13/38) |
| 33% (4/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 36% (4/11) |
| 42% (44/104) | Return Points Win % | 39% (39/99) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
David Pichler Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Nikolas Sanchez-Izquierdo
Player
David Pichler
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Inaki Montes-De La Torre
Player
David Pichler
57%
(
52 of
92)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
2
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
1
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
35%
(
14 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
41 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
82
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 0-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Nicolas Alvarez Varona
58%
(
56 of
97)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
33 of
41)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
43%
(
42 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
81
Total Points Won
85
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Steven Diez
Player
David Pichler
62%
(
66 of
106)
1st Serve %
53%
(
46 of
87)
5
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
4
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
42 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
87)
103
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(5) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laurent Lokoli
Player
David Pichler
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
67%
(
65 of
97)
5
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
4
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
29 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
93
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eliakim Coulibaly
Player
David Pichler
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Martin Landaluce
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
19 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
David Pichler
57%
(
78 of
138)
1st Serve %
67%
(
75 of
112)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
55 of
75)
60%
(
36 of
60)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
37%
(
51 of
138)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
38 of
112)
125
Total Points Won
125
|
6-7(4) 7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Neil Oberleitner
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Martin Krumich
88%
(
37 of
42)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
George Von Massow Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Fermin Tenti
Player
George Von Massow
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
44 of
77)
0
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
23 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
George Von Massow
Player
Filip Cristian Jianu
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve %
75%
(
47 of
63)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
63)
74
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
George Von Massow
Player
Luca Prevosto
58%
(
66 of
114)
1st Serve %
75%
(
86 of
114)
14
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
8
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
57 of
86)
58%
(
28 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
43 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
45 of
114)
116
Total Points Won
112
|
6-2 6-7(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
George Von Massow
Player
Majed Kilani
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Erler
Player
George Von Massow
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
75%
(
51 of
68)
3
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
0
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
23 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
22 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaroslav Pospisil
Player
George Von Massow
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
6
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| SF | 7-6(5) 6-7(6) 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (350/278) | Win/Loss | 52% (189/173) |
| 56% (805/642) | Sets Win/Loss | 51% (425/407) |
| 53% (7015/6323) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (3965/3844) |
| 58% (121/86) | Hard Win/Loss | 56% (50/39) |
| 55% (202/162) | Clay Win/Loss | 54% (124/105) |
| 48% (27/29) | Indoor Hard W/L | 34% (15/29) |
| 0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.27 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 1771 | Aces Total | 864 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
| 1086 | Total Double Faults | 425 |
| 1:32:43 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 541.37 | Average Opponent Rank | 522.14 |
| 60% (22282/36941) | 1st Serve % | 64% (7066/11117) |
| 68% (15070/22282) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (4999/7066) |
| 50% (7400/14658) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (1922/4049) |
| 46% (1820/3985) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (408/1001) |
| 42% (15657/37682) | Return Points Win % | 38% (4201/11050) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 40% (35/53) | Challenger W/L | 50% (18/18) |
| 58% (315/224) | Futures W/L | 52% (171/155) |
| 55% (339/612) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (186/356) |
| 67% (4/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 55% (79/143) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 43% (48/112) |
| 44% (86/195) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (63/112) |
| 83% (372/309) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (177/157) |
| 17% (372/62) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (177/20) |
| 16% (256/41) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (185/32) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
